Argues that social networking is anchored in surveillance practices - however a positive connotation - empowering, subjectivity building, playful - participatory surveillance
Page 1
3rd para - rejects online/offline dichotomy in favor of social networking as a "mixed world" relating to both online and offline activities
The practice of online social networking: space, place & time
cyrberspace - the spatial metaphor
4th para - "the owner of a space provides details in a profile with personal information" referring to myspace
My comment- so many contradictions there - users do not "own" the space...what about privacy policies?
Page 3
2nd para - danah boyd - online social networking as a mdeiated public is characterized by four properties: persistency (info is stored indefinitely), searchability (convenience of search terms), replicability (configurable to other texts and forms), and invisible audiences (content is available to not your network but everyone - aka who is looking at your stuff?)
Albrechtslund argues this makes relationships eternal - existing beyond the control of the involved person. SM is thought of as "of the moment" but is actually longer lasting
Page 4
6th para - People offer their personal info on SNS (social networking service)
Lyon calls this "leaky containers" (p37-48) - data move freely between different sectors of society with the result that information from different contexts (home, work, shopping) are being mixed
Page 5
1st para - In addition to privacy policy issues & design of SNS, there are shortcomings on the part of the user - ignorance, indifferences, and dependency on others.
2nd para - education, training, and even gov regulations (such as DOPA - deleting online pred. act) try to protext younger users from the dangers of SNS
Author notes that Jenkins & boyd are against DOPA for over restricting access
5th para - Life after social networks - what are the implications of digital footprints when getting a job or what might haunt teenagers when they become an adult? (longitudinal thinking/planning)
9th para - danah boyd - critical of hiring practices that punish SM users
author adds that it could be discrimination or ethical injustice not to hire someone that uses SNS
Page 6
5th para - Particpatory Surveillance
Traditional surveillance - panopticon where the "watched" is in no power and their subjectivity is destroyed (dystopian view)
6th para - "It is difficult to understand the phenomenon of online social networking and related web 2.0 services and applications when we apply this notion of surveillance." (the dystopian view)
Albrechtslund is critical of scholars talking about going beyond the panopticon rather than actually doing it.
he thinks it's useful for theorizing surveillance, but calls for an expansion of the surveillance field.
(I suppose he feels that surveillance studies is stuck on the dystopian view of surveillance (panopticon) and although talks about going beyond it, continually refers to digital media as dystopian surveillance (stuck with panopticon))
Author argues that to truly understand surveillance, we need to challenge the hierarchical conception of it. He acknowledges the dystopian view is important however.
Page 7
surveillance as a mutual, horizontal practice:
surveillance as flat - where even the person under surveillance can have agency
Andrejevic offers "later surveillance" which is peer to peer monitoring and although helpful, he brings in the Pentagon and panopticon strategies for a disciplinary approach. Thus, it does adequately serve Albrechtslund's vision.
6th para - empowerment, subjectivity building, and sharing - under developed areas in surveillance studies. SNS is not about destroying subjectivities, it is about mutuality and building
-uses the example of exhibitionism to "rebel against the shame associated with not being private"
-a "self construction of identity"
(Me: this is way too overly optimistic)
Page 8
2nd para - SNS empowering b/c you can be active - socialize with people and take action since surveillance now allows users to seek information and communicate.
SNS illustrated that surveillance is fundamentally social
(Me: The deep data that SNS collects is NOT the same data that users can search for on Twitter)
Defends his "participatory surveillance" against "participatiory panopticon" because he says participatory panopticon is redundant - the whole idea of the panopticon was to have the inmate internalize the surveillance and pattern self-surveillance, which is already particpatory. Albrechtslund's particpatory surveillance is empowering and constructs subjectivities because the "inmate" has agency.
Doesn't want to mitigate dangers in SNS, but says we should also focus on the social forms of surveillance.
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label surveillance. Show all posts
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Andrejevic (2002) The Work of Being Watched: Interactive Media and the Exploitation of Self-Disclosure
231 - Andrejevic sets out to further (update) the work of Smythe (1977) and Jhally & Livant (1986).
231 - Viewers "are being recruited to participate in the labor of being watched to unprecedented degree by subjecting the details of their daily lives to increasingly pervasive and comprehensive forms of high-tech monitoring."
232 - This surveillance is not for its repressive force, but rather for its potential productive deployment; companies need to know what is being consumed, how it's being consumed, when, where, and by who.
232-233 - Goal is to offer an alternative view to the debate of privacy over online interactive media
233 - People are willingly surrendering their personal info for convenience and customization - promises of interactive media
233 - Taylorism as digital technologies & watching viewers
234 - Foucault - Discipline & Punish - power of surveillance is a productive power - increase production, develop economy - as in Taylorism - p. 208, 1977.
234 - Marketing employs surveillance as to predict consumption through the records of consumer behaviors & other demo info.
234 - Foucault moves surveillance beyond the workplace & into the home as a necessary condition of capitalism
235 - "The information economy - including that designed to stimulate consumption via the accumulation, manipulation, and deployment of information derived from consumer surveillance - is economically productive, and the labor associated with it can be identified by its status as a value-generating activity."
235 - It's about supply & demand... with growing supplies, marketers must increase & stimulate demand for products, and to do this effectively, require detailed personal information to understand how consumers consume. Therefore, consumption and production are tied together.
235 - Interactive technologies offload this work of data collection onto the consumer who disclose their personal data in the act of consumption.
235 - Jhally & Livant's 1986 analysis: audiences perform work by viewing advertising in exchange for payment in the form of programming content. Viewing is productive because watching ads helps speed up the selling & circulation of commodities. This cuts down on on circulation and storage costs for producers.
236 - Taylorism & Television: Niche marketing (direct marketing) is meant to limit wasted watching. To do this, detailed personal and behavioral data is required - which comes in the form of TV ratings. Nielsen does the watching, so advertisers know the work of audiences is being done as efficently as possible. Therefore, ratings are commodities because they help rationalize the viewing process in what Mosco & Meehan call "cybernetic commodities." (feedback commodities produced through consumption or interaction)
236 - Digital/Informational technologies becomes useful because now direct/individual marketing is now a possibility when before it was either too expensive or technologically impossible.
238 - discusses variable pricing of e-commerce where prices for the same project differ based on collected demographic data.
238 - The Digital Enclosure - surveillance based rationalization - activities traditionally carried outside of monitoring are now folded into digital technologies for monitoring & data collection
Often times this is voluntary, but even Andrejevic hints that it may soon not be.
The draw? Lester (2001) calls it the "tyranny of convenience"
Also, there may be an exclusivity involved where certain media products can only be found online
Surveillance is creeping into the realm of free-time
238 - Privacy Quote: "1999 Wall Street Journal-NBC poll cited by Lester (2001) for its finding that 'privacy is the issue that concerns Americans most about the twenty-first century, ahead of overpopulation, racial tensions, and global warming' (p. 27).
239 - Andrejevic suggests that privacy laws may not be helpful in that they hinder the economy - which relies on marketing and selling commodities effectively. He observes that an alternative ideology is surveillance as a form of consumer control. Celebrants & corporations discuss how the consumer now has all the control, which is endorsing the digital enclosure! While Andrejevic doesn't deny there is some truth to this control, he says we cannot ignore the exploitative properties. He says this control and individualism is merely a "ruse" to have users self-disclose their info while media still remains a form of mass consumption. (The individualism being sold is really to benefit the marketing side, not the consuming side!)
240-41 - Viewers get a lot of bells and whistles that appear to challenge the norms of the industry, but it's actually the industry investing in this for the sole purpose of data collection.
242-43 - Tivo, like digital technologies' main components are: Customization (for both production and consumption), Interactivity (ability to monitor consumers consuming), Offloading of work onto the consumer (who generate their own data), and development of a relationship (for the longitudinal collection of personal data and trends.)
243 - It's not the death of privacy, but the shift in control over personal information from consumers to the private sector.
244 - the more sophisticated surveillance means that exist, the more stimulated the market & economy become.
244-45 - for Foucault, where ever there is power, there is a "potential for resistance."
245 - a more passive data collection approach is the cookie where, instead of actively submitting data through online forms and surveys, websites collect data for the convenience of users re-visiting websites and provide it to marketers.
Andrejevic argues that once the idea of privacy as dead is debunked, we can then address the unequal access to data which leads to exploitation.
231 - Viewers "are being recruited to participate in the labor of being watched to unprecedented degree by subjecting the details of their daily lives to increasingly pervasive and comprehensive forms of high-tech monitoring."
232 - This surveillance is not for its repressive force, but rather for its potential productive deployment; companies need to know what is being consumed, how it's being consumed, when, where, and by who.
232-233 - Goal is to offer an alternative view to the debate of privacy over online interactive media
233 - People are willingly surrendering their personal info for convenience and customization - promises of interactive media
233 - Taylorism as digital technologies & watching viewers
234 - Foucault - Discipline & Punish - power of surveillance is a productive power - increase production, develop economy - as in Taylorism - p. 208, 1977.
234 - Marketing employs surveillance as to predict consumption through the records of consumer behaviors & other demo info.
234 - Foucault moves surveillance beyond the workplace & into the home as a necessary condition of capitalism
235 - "The information economy - including that designed to stimulate consumption via the accumulation, manipulation, and deployment of information derived from consumer surveillance - is economically productive, and the labor associated with it can be identified by its status as a value-generating activity."
235 - It's about supply & demand... with growing supplies, marketers must increase & stimulate demand for products, and to do this effectively, require detailed personal information to understand how consumers consume. Therefore, consumption and production are tied together.
235 - Interactive technologies offload this work of data collection onto the consumer who disclose their personal data in the act of consumption.
235 - Jhally & Livant's 1986 analysis: audiences perform work by viewing advertising in exchange for payment in the form of programming content. Viewing is productive because watching ads helps speed up the selling & circulation of commodities. This cuts down on on circulation and storage costs for producers.
236 - Taylorism & Television: Niche marketing (direct marketing) is meant to limit wasted watching. To do this, detailed personal and behavioral data is required - which comes in the form of TV ratings. Nielsen does the watching, so advertisers know the work of audiences is being done as efficently as possible. Therefore, ratings are commodities because they help rationalize the viewing process in what Mosco & Meehan call "cybernetic commodities." (feedback commodities produced through consumption or interaction)
236 - Digital/Informational technologies becomes useful because now direct/individual marketing is now a possibility when before it was either too expensive or technologically impossible.
238 - discusses variable pricing of e-commerce where prices for the same project differ based on collected demographic data.
238 - The Digital Enclosure - surveillance based rationalization - activities traditionally carried outside of monitoring are now folded into digital technologies for monitoring & data collection
Often times this is voluntary, but even Andrejevic hints that it may soon not be.
The draw? Lester (2001) calls it the "tyranny of convenience"
Also, there may be an exclusivity involved where certain media products can only be found online
Surveillance is creeping into the realm of free-time
238 - Privacy Quote: "1999 Wall Street Journal-NBC poll cited by Lester (2001) for its finding that 'privacy is the issue that concerns Americans most about the twenty-first century, ahead of overpopulation, racial tensions, and global warming' (p. 27).
239 - Andrejevic suggests that privacy laws may not be helpful in that they hinder the economy - which relies on marketing and selling commodities effectively. He observes that an alternative ideology is surveillance as a form of consumer control. Celebrants & corporations discuss how the consumer now has all the control, which is endorsing the digital enclosure! While Andrejevic doesn't deny there is some truth to this control, he says we cannot ignore the exploitative properties. He says this control and individualism is merely a "ruse" to have users self-disclose their info while media still remains a form of mass consumption. (The individualism being sold is really to benefit the marketing side, not the consuming side!)
240-41 - Viewers get a lot of bells and whistles that appear to challenge the norms of the industry, but it's actually the industry investing in this for the sole purpose of data collection.
242-43 - Tivo, like digital technologies' main components are: Customization (for both production and consumption), Interactivity (ability to monitor consumers consuming), Offloading of work onto the consumer (who generate their own data), and development of a relationship (for the longitudinal collection of personal data and trends.)
243 - It's not the death of privacy, but the shift in control over personal information from consumers to the private sector.
244 - the more sophisticated surveillance means that exist, the more stimulated the market & economy become.
244-45 - for Foucault, where ever there is power, there is a "potential for resistance."
245 - a more passive data collection approach is the cookie where, instead of actively submitting data through online forms and surveys, websites collect data for the convenience of users re-visiting websites and provide it to marketers.
Andrejevic argues that once the idea of privacy as dead is debunked, we can then address the unequal access to data which leads to exploitation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)